Comments on: my package of the day – sash – the Stand Alone SHell for system recovery http://www.screenage.de/blog/2008/06/13/my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:40:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: ccm http://www.screenage.de/blog/2008/06/13/my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-1358 ccm Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:20:16 +0000 http://www.screenage.de/blog/2008/06/13/my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery/#comment-1358 @greg: Definetely more useful than bash-static as it has built-in commands. You should not miss that point. Actually I cannot compare it to busybox right now, that is maybe a comparable technology though I don't know if it is static and has all necessary commands built in. @greg:

Definetely more useful than bash-static as it has built-in commands. You should not miss that point. Actually I cannot compare it to busybox right now, that is maybe a comparable technology though I don’t know if it is static and has all necessary commands built in.

]]> By: greg http://www.screenage.de/blog/2008/06/13/my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery/comment-page-1/#comment-1351 greg Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:26:54 +0000 http://www.screenage.de/blog/2008/06/13/my-package-of-the-day-sash-the-stand-alone-shell-for-system-recovery/#comment-1351 better than busybox ? Or more useful than bash-static ? :o) better than busybox ? Or more useful than bash-static ? :o )

]]>